Myths-Dreams-Symbols          Myths-Dreams-Symbols Was Designed By Cre8tiveThinking.com. Click Here To Visit Our Site
             S cience Fact or Science Fiction

Image of Jesus
Fact or Fiction?


         

Shroud of Turin

The infamous shroud of Turin has been the center of speculation for over 600 years. From the knightly presentations of the artifact to the current scientific analysis, the rectangular cloth has split people into factions of believers and skeptics.

The shroud itself is 14 feet 3 inches (4.34 meters) long and 3 feet 7 inches (1.09 meters) wide and has the basic color of a worn out old sheet. On the shroud is a life size image of a man who has the crucifixion wounds of Jesus- including the punctures from the thorn crown, bloody lashings on his back from the Romans and the holes through the wrists and ankles. Many believe the shroud is the same cloth that Jesus was wrapped in after his death and the resurrection process exerted such energy that his image was imprinted on the cloth.

During the 14th century a knight named Geoffrey de Charny I put the shroud on display in Lirey, France. Roughly 100 years later, in 1453, it was given to Charny's granddaughter Marguerite who presented it to the Duke Louis of Savoy. When the temple the shroud was kept in caught fire in 1532, the people were able to bring it to safety with only a few burn marks. Finally in 1578 it was given to the Turin cathedral, where it is housed even to this day.

Up until the 1890s, scientists didn't really pay attention to the shroud because the image is fairly translucent. Research began to pick up, however, when photographer Secondo Pia took several prints of the shroud and found the negatives strongly show the image of a crucified man. With the pictures, people could finally make out a tall scraggily man between 30 and 40 who had horrendous wounds.

Although the image and basic idea of its background were known, how it reached Europe was still a mystery. Various theories, including the idea proposed by Oxford researcher Ian Wilson that the shroud was actually the mandylion, were suggested and later rejected.

With no way of gaining an understanding of its travels, scientists soon began to date the cloth. In 1989 a team of researchers from Oxford took, with permission from the Catholic Church, several samples to carbon date. Using carbon-14 dating techniques, the teams found the shroud to have originated between 1260 and 1390. This doesn't end the controversy of its creation, though. Dr. Thomas Phillips, from Harvard's High Energy Physics Lab, believes the body in the shroud gave off such powerful energy that it produced bursts of neutrons, disturbing the carbon dating.

If one is to look at the carbon dating as correct, then the shroud's image is not that of Jesus. This has lead to the belief that Leonardo de Vinci actually created the shroud! Working with various tools and substances available in his time, de Vinci could have created the three-dimensional image using a corpse. After carving the body to include the needed wounds produced by a crucifixion, many believe de Vinci placed the image of his own face on the shroud! Several researchers were able to create a similar shroud using objects readily available to de Vinci.

The mystery behind the shroud is not closed. For well over 600 years the shroud has remained a mystery. With present day technology, we may be unable to find it's real origin.


Fact


According to Dr. Walter McCrone and his colleagues at McCrone Associates, the 3+ by 14+ foot cloth depicting Christ's crucified body is an inspired painting produced by a Medieval artist just before its first appearance in recorded history in 1356. The faint sepia image is made up of billions of submicron pigment particles (red ochre and vermilion) in a collagen tempera medium. Dr. McCrone determined this by polarized light microscopy in 1979. This included careful inspection of thousands of linen fibers from 32 different areas (Shroud and sample points), characterization of the only colored image-forming particles by color, refractive indices, polarized light microscopy, size, shape, and microchemical tests for iron, mercury, and body fluids. The paint pigments were dispersed in a collagen tempera (produced in medieval times, perhaps, from parchment). It is chemically distinctly different in composition from blood but readily detected and identified microscopically by microchemical staining reactions. Forensic tests for blood were uniformly negative on fibers from the blood-image tapes.

There is no blood in any image area, only red ochre and vermilion in a collagen tempera medium. The red ochre is present on 20 of both body- and blood-image tapes; the vermilion only on 11 blood-image tapes. Both pigments are absent on the 12 non-image tape fibers.

The Electron Optics Group at McCrone Associates (John Gavrilovic, Anna Teetsov, Mark Andersen, Ralph Hinsch, Howard Humecki, Betty Majewski, and Deborah Piper) in 1980 used electron and x-ray diffraction and found red ochre (iron oxide, hematite) and vermilion (mercuric sulfide); their electron microprobe analyzer found iron, mercury, and sulfur on a dozen of the blood-image area samples. The results fully confirmed Dr. McCrone's results and further proved the image was painted twice-once with red ochre, followed by vermilion to enhance the blood-image areas.

The carbon-dating results from three different internationally known laboratories agreed well with his date: 1355 by microscopy and 1325 by C-14 dating. The suggestion that the 1532 Chambery fire changed the date of the cloth is ludicrous. Samples for C-dating are routinely and completely burned to CO2 as part of a well-tested purification procedure. The suggestions that modern biological contaminants were sufficient to modernize the date are also ridiculous. A weight of 20th century carbon equaling nearly two times the weight of the Shroud carbon itself would be required to change a 1st century date to the 14th century (see Carbon 14 graph). Besides this, the linen cloth samples were very carefully cleaned before analysis at each of the C-dating laboratories.

Experimental details on the tests carried out at McCrone Associates or the McCrone Research Institute are available in five papers published in three different peer-reviewed journal articles: Microscope 1980, 28, 105, 115; 1981, 29, 19; Wiener Berichte uber Naturwissenschaft in der Kunst 1987/1988, 4/5, 50 and Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 77-83.

Conclusion:

The "Shroud" is a beautiful painting created about 1355 for a new church in need of a pilgrim-attracting relic.



Return To
Science Fact or Science Fiction